A short reminder, if you haven't voted, you can still send an email to Chris at secretary at peeringdb.com<mailto:secretary at peeringdb.com> and ask for inclusion on the BigPulse voting system for your network ..
Voting should be done before monday Nov. 30, 2015.
You need to be registered to the mailinglist to be 'seen' as a peeringDB member ...
- If you want to participate in the process, please subscribe to the
pdb-gov "governance" mailing list with your PeeringDB account email.
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov
Regards,
Erik Bais
Op 21 okt. 2015 om 16:39 heeft Job Snijders <job at ntt.net<mailto:job at ntt.net>> het volgende geschreven:
Dear NLNOG,
Many of you are probably familiar with "PeeringDB", one of the most
awesome resources for interconnection. What some of you might not know,
is that PeeringDB is evolving from a bunch of php scripts into a real
organisation with a board and appropiate legal registrations! And as
PeeringDB stakeholder you can actually have say in how things are run! :-)
Please review Chris Caputo's message below and subscribe yourself to the
"pdb-gov" mailing list to stay informed about PeeringDB's governance.
Being subscribed to the pdb-gov mailing list (in essence) means you are
a 'member' and this will grant your organisation one vote in the
upcoming elections.
Kind regards,
Job
----- Forwarded message from Chris Caputo <secretary at peeringdb.com<mailto:secretary at peeringdb.com>> -----
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Chris Caputo <secretary at peeringdb.com<mailto:secretary@peeringdb.com>>
To: pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com<mailto:pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com>
Subject: [PDB-gov] PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan
Results of the survey which ended August 15th, along with anonymous
comments are up at:
https://www.caputo.com/pdb/20150800_PDB_Survey_results.pdf
91 responses, of which 89 voted for the main question:
PeeringDB functions should be performed by:
- 35 votes, 39.33%: "An independent 501(C)(6) (Not for profit) PeeringDB,
with it's own elected board and members"
- 14 votes, 15.73%: "The existing global standards body OpenIX 501(C)(6)
(Not for profit)"
- 10 votes, 11.24%: "The existing regional organization NANOG 501(C)(3)
(Not for profit)"
- 30 votes, 33.71%: "I don't care just as long as PeeringDB keeps
working"
That looks like a clear vote for independence, given that the number for
independence is 45% more than the combined votes for OpenIX and NANOG.
Based on this, we are going to continue working toward becoming an
independent non-profit corporation. In the interest of broad support,
this is going to be done with transparency and inclusion using the pdb-gov
mailing list. The plan:
- If you want to participate in the process, please subscribe to the
pdb-gov "governance" mailing list with your PeeringDB account email.
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov
- Further emails will be sent to pdb-gov mailing list and posted to
http://gov.peeringdb.com/ as appropriate.
- pdb-gov is where the draft organizational documents will be discussed
and refined. These draft documents are up at:
https://www.caputo.com/pdb/
- There will be elections for the initial Board of Directors. Candidacies
along with max 300 word statements should be submitted to
secretary at peeringdb.com<mailto:secretary at peeringdb.com> prior to November 15th. Anyone can run for
election to the initial Board.
- The interim Secretary (tentatively Chris Caputo) will send out ballots
to pdb-gov on November 15th, with voting to happen through November
30th. The org docs currently proscribe one ballot per member
organization. The interim Secretary will break ties through public
random means. The Secretary will not be eligible for election to the
initial Board.
- The initial Board will decide on officers, per the tentative Bylaws.
The draft documents will then be signed and filed.
_______________________________________________
Pdb-gov mailing list
Pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com<mailto:Pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com>
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
NLNOG mailing list
NLNOG at nlnog.net<mailto:NLNOG at nlnog.net>
http://mailman.nlnog.net/mailman/listinfo/nlnog
Zie https://labs.spotify.com/2015/11/05/oh-ipv6-where-art-thou/
Enkele quotes:
"IPv6 support was enabled in the Spotify Android client in version 2.9.0. Today about 4% of all backend connections made from an Android device originate in an IPv6 network.
So what about our other clients? Up until now there has been no compelling reason to enable IPv6 support other than for the good of mankind.
However, Apple is now talking about making IPv6 compatibility a requirement for apps in the App Store. Therefore the iOS client has just enabled IPv6 support, which is gradually rolling out starting in version 4.3.0.
ï¿ŒOur partner Facebook is also pushing IPv6 and they are implementing an IPv6-only network in their offices. The desktop client does not work in an IPv6-only network so the Facebook engineers are sad because they can no longer rock. Sad Facebook is lifting the IPv6 priority for the desktop client as well."
