26 Sep
2018
26 Sep
'18
2:44 p.m.
On 2018-09-26 14:16, nusenu wrote:
If the invalids are expected (i.e. to test ROV) - like Job's prefixes are I suppose - than you can ignore this email (and maybe drop me an email).
I can confirm my invalids are for testing purposes :-)
thanks for confirming, I'll exclude AS15562 from future reports.
Isn't is a better approach to only exclude the current false positive prefixes? If Job starts announcing a new prefix and he makes a mistake in his ROAs (yes, even Job can make mistakes... ;) ) I'm sure he want to know about it. I have no idea how much effort this is in your code, but it sounds to me like a better approach :). Thanks for the report though, I think this is a useful tool. Kind regards, Cybertinus